🔗 Share this article

I have a few thoughts regarding the remarks delivered by the sports network broadcaster Chris Fowler following the Serbian champion's win over the American player in the US Open quarter-finals. Look – Fritz is the United States, Fowler is from the US – and sports often encourage patriotic sentiment. Some letdown would have been understandable. Instead, he invoked the continued absence of US male players at grand slam tournaments: not one of them has won a trophy since the last American champion in 2003, and he had been the final representative in the tournament.

Everyone enjoy a storyline, myself included. But come on. Even if Fritz defeated the legend for the first time, force of nature the Spanish star was waiting in the next round, whom he has never defeated in an official match. And had he someway gotten past that, it would have been defending champion the Italian, versus him Fritz had dropped 10 of the last 11 sets. The two young stars had also split the previous seven grand slams (plus Alcaraz proceeded to thrash a tired Djokovic in the next round). He stated in press after the loss that he in fact preferred his draw, because it presented the chance to beat the three best players in the world in succession. Fritz is more than within his right to aim for the accomplishment; an athlete is meant to have faith in themselves. But entering that Djokovic quarter-final what other person in their right mind had the lack of US winners in mind?

The American star's second serve the sole barrier standing in her way and sustained success

The American, 28, is placed fourth in the world entering the upcoming ATP World Tour Finals and has won his last six matches over third-ranked the German with increasing ease. It's likely he could take that spot for himself in the future. But evidently that at present, that is as far as he can climb: The Italian and Spaniard lie a chasm of performance metrics away. His top-class serve and powerful power on each front side and reverse side are sufficiently adequate to defeat the majority of rivals on the ATP tour. When facing the select few generational talents, though, he is frequently overmatched. The past few seasons has witnessed the interesting emergence of lanky, towering players who can nevertheless move around with the alarming speed and fluidity of smaller men. Fritz is 6ft 5ins and looks it. His movement is rigid, as if he’s still getting used to his limbs. So he’ll rarely win a rally that the opponent was dictating, and hitting a soft shot versus him is usually a reliable tactic. That acts as a quite severe restriction on his potential.

The American has achieved a number of dramatic, unexpected improvements over the years. Early on of the ten-year period, he was hovering around the lower end of the top 30. 24 months after, he was approaching the top 10. The previous season, he suddenly exploded to No 4 – and held the position. But the subsequent step, competing against and beating all-time-greats like the young Spaniard, Sinner, and including a declining Djokovic, is the highest of all. What could the commentator have been thinking? That Fritz, in 2025, was a legitimate contender to defeat them all back-to-back? That it was appropriate mentioning the continuing slump of US male players lifting grand slams when Fritz had departed the US Open in the quarter-finals? The thirst is simply too much and the appreciation for the difficulty of the challenge too little.

The American star made a career-best advancement to the Wimbledon semi-finals in July.

The American's play in that exact quarter-final ought to have been enough of an sign. The Serbian won in four sets, a victory that only seemed uncertain for brief periods towards the conclusion, when Fritz had saved a couple match points and had a chance to maintain serve for 5-5. The pair appeared well-balanced during the rallies, with the American earning numerous opportunities to win the opponent's serve. But the champion rescued break point after break point, prolonging the streak to the brink of frustration. When Fritz eventually did convert one of the chances at 5-5 in the second set, he immediately played a horrendous service game to lose his own serve once more; Djokovic had lulled him into a skirmish secondary to the main contest and compelled him to use excessive energy to win it. Down set points in the last game, his primary delivery floated to the sky. He extended the contest twice on his second serve, but ultimately double-faulted. It wasn’t a choke, in my opinion, only a consequence of needing to hit too many weaker deliveries.

The contest was quite compelling proof that the American is insufficiently skilled to defeat any form of Djokovic, who was defeated by Alcaraz in the following match and never especially seem like he believed he could triumph. This is perfectly fine – Djokovic is the greatest of all time, and might not be at the height of his athletic abilities anymore, but has acquired sufficient experience and tactical know-how to make up for a significant portion of the drop-off. The problem is the individuals who were anticipating Fritz to win, and putting pressure on him to do so, when he was yet to done anything that indicated he would.

Fritz is an asset to the tour regardless. He’s a patient, thoughtful voice in press conferences, exceeding virtually everyone on the men's tour aside from the Russian star, prepared to not just express how he feels or the tactic he felt determined a match, but explain it. That he should bear the brunt of the blame for America failing to spawn a male major champion since the last American titlist feels unjust. (Since the fellow American is competing alongside him in the rankings, perhaps they can share that burden.)

Year-End Championships: Singles Groups

Jimmy Connors Group

• Carlos Alcaraz (Sp)
• The American contender
• Alex de Minaur (Aus)
• Lorenzo Musetti (It)

Swedish icon Division

• The Italian champion
• Alexander Zverev (Ger)
• The rising American
• Félix Auger-Aliassime (Can)

“I would likely dwell on it forever if I fail to do it,” Fritz informed an interviewer in June of claiming a major. It is hoped he understands that he’s not a failure if he doesn’t fulfill that goal, that breaking through Alcaraz and Sinner’s dominant, formidable empire is actually extremely improbable for everybody else. {