🔗 Share this article

Following a significant legal reversal, a national review panel has overturned a prior decision that prevented Australian-based users from seeing video footage of the shooting incident involving influencer Charlie Kirk. The appeal was lodged by Elon Musk's social media platform, arguing against an order issued at the request of the national eSafety commissioner.

Details of the Case and Ban

Following the fatal shooting of Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University in September, the eSafety commissioner applied to the review board to officially classify the available footage. The board initially ruled the content was "refused classification", a rating that empowered the regulator to order platforms to geo-block the videos for an Australian audience.

The platform X challenged the decision for a pair of videos related to the Kirk incident. Additionally, it contested a comparable ban on another piece of footage—depicting the assault of Iryna Zarutska on a North Carolina train—which had likewise been classified as "unacceptable for distribution".

The Platform's Case and Final Ruling

In its appeal, X asserted that the Kirk video contained only a short moment of violence with no visible weapon. It was argued the footage was grainy and the camera quickly panned away from the victim to the surrounding crowd.

X maintained the footage was not excessively detailed, gratuitous, or offensive, stating it served as a neutral objective record of "a notorious public event of historical and political significance that prompted extensive public discourse". X even compared the footage and the well-known recording of the JFK shooting.

The majority of the classification panel ultimately agreed that, "notwithstanding the heinous nature of the event," the content did not reach a level that was gratuitous, exploitative or offensive enough to warrant a 'refused classification' rating. However, they noted that a more detailed depiction with alternative commentary might have met that threshold. Consequently, the panel changed the classification of the content to R18+.

The Minority Viewpoint

Some on the panel disagreed, contending the post was "content designed for sharing for the likely purposes of amusement and/or personal gain (such as likes, shares, or views)". This view stated the comparison to the JFK assassination tape was invalid, as that footage was made public long after the event, "once emotions around the matter had calmed".

Reactions to the Outcome

Posting on its official policy channel, the platform welcomed the ruling.

"We challenged this case to uphold free speech and the importance of access to information about matters of public significance. We remain committed to safeguarding these principles."

A spokesperson for the eSafety commissioner also welcomed the board's decision, but noted that the revised classification now means platforms "must take steps to ensure R18+ material being displayed to Australians under 18".

Broader Context on Violent Content

In related news, the eSafety commissioner has not issued formal notices to platforms this week regarding graphic footage from the Sydney beach incident shared across social media. The regulator stated that while the images were distressing, they did not reach the high threshold for a "total ban" rating.

Instead, the companies have been advised to use sensitive content labels and screens, such as obscuring the image, on this material in accordance with their existing community guidelines.